The Royal Navy Research Archive General Message Board

For more discussion boards, grouped by topic, visit the new RN Research Archive forum - Click here

Re:Service Record 1914

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ][ The Royal Navy Research Archive ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Philo on January 24, 2008 at 04:15:49:
In Reply to: Service Record 1914 posted by Tim Challinor on January 23, 2008 at 14:56:06:
IP:195.93.21.37

am not certain, but I don't think you can actually tell his offence from what is on the record; I suspect that this is warrant number 31.

King's Regulations for 1913, which governed the Royal Navy at this time, may be found at:

http://www.pbenyon1.plus.com/KR&AI/Index.html

and looking at the 'table of punishments' section, at:

http://www.pbenyon1.plus.com/KR&AI/Discipline.html#Tables

then one can see both that all punishments are numbered (detention was no.4) and there is a table to show when No.4 punishment would be awarded. This reveals that to be confined in detention, it would normally mean a serious offence, such as desertion, deception, wilful disobedience, drunk on duty, skulking from your post, insubordination, insolence and contempt, criminal damage to naval property etc.

Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ][ The Royal Navy Research Archive ] [ FAQ ]

For more discussion boards, grouped by topic, visit the new RN Research Archive forum - Click here


Google


Ad Free Message Board | Terms Of Service | Smilies Legend | EBCode Legend
Copyright ©2000 - 2003 eBoards4all.com & GDS Net Services INC
Free Arcade Games | Free Image Galleries | Free Guest Books
Hosted by eBoards4all.com