Re:Nature of light

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ][ open arms open heart ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Vicente on August 30, 2008 at 12:09:55:
In Reply to: Re:Nature of light posted by rain on August 30, 2008 at 11:38:27:
IP:75.210.52.145

E is energy
M is mass
c the so-called speed of light
2 implies the square of
< is less than

E is the same as mc2 (or mass times the speed of light squared). Mass X the speed of light squared is ALWAYS less than c (or the speed of light).

"Imagine accelerating to the so-called speed of light, that is 299,792 kilometers per second (186,282 miles per second). If you are unfamiliar with Einstein’s theory of relativity, as you approach this so-called speed of light, time slows to zero, space no longer exists, and mass cancels itself out. You do not enter a new dimension, but a dimensionlessness within the still bliss of undivided light.

For those who have already ventured there, an immediate inner inquiry comes to our attention if we allow it: How did you reach a velocity of 299,792 kilometers per second and arrive at stillness? You just stepped into light’s shoes, so you connected with light’s own point of view, a view that light travels no distance in no time, and thus it has no need for speed. In fact, undivided, clear light has not traveled a single meter in all eternity.

How does one describe it in laymens terms? I'm not a layman.

When did people accept that the Earth is not flat? Surely not immediately. It is very difficult for people to see beyond their beliefs.

V

Follow Ups:



Post a Followup


    Name:
    Email:
    Subject:

    Message


    Optional Image URL:
    Optional Link URL:
    Optional Link Title:

    Notify me by email of all message replies.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ][