Re: Oxford's old definition of wisdom

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ][ I shut my eyes in order to see ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Eza on November 19, 2011 at 08:42:25:
In Reply to: ezoeza's old definition of wisdom posted by Tara on November 19, 2011 at 06:49:35:
IP:75.254.38.246

Even though many New Agers except your New Age definitions, for the few the few Freethinkers around, you must first submit them to Oxford for inclusion into the English language.

I could write, "Jobhoppers quadroon the molar homunculus." But who would interprete it as valid? Or have any meaningful conversation using contemporary rap, where everything sounds like a repetition of "fee fow for mo fokker."

In all my research into a myriad of subjects, no subject is more cerebral than people talking about the Heart. And in truth, that is all they're doing, talking about their ego feelings as if it's the heart,...as if they even have a clue what Heart-Mind or consciousness actually is. But, if you tell a lie long enough, the cerebral-centric believe it,...that's the nature of ego-mind,...the mind that doesn't even exist.

Because I've actually uncovered Heart-Mind in the context of the Heart sutra, I truly understand where people are coming from in their constant barrage of (as you say) ego generated drivel. I understand their difficulty with grasping that the quality of an open heart is intimately connected with the realization of real compassion. Real compassion, as described in the Heart Sutra, does not avoid or appease, but insists upon being acquainted with truth.

Real compassion, which your posts show you are unaware of, ONLY arises through an Open-Heart. Absolutely no Heart (in the context of Heart-Mind, not the New Age context of ego's therapuetic society), is accessed through a belief in an independent, separate self.

I realize you have no interest in that,...seeing through the Clear Light,...the correct way of understanding reality,...of uncovering your Avidyâ.

That is clear by your use of terms like the oxymoron "heart-intelligent" people. The Heart is never intelligent,...that is, having a high mental capacity and quick thought. Heart-Mind CANNOT be accessed through the 6th sense of the intellect.

In other words, your words consistently show a thorough lack of understanding Heart-Mind,...which is being brought up out of compassion.

As Charles Haanel said, “The mind cannot comprehend an entirely new idea until a corresponding vibratory brain cell has been prepared to receive it.” Eza says that Heart-Mind remains obscured until the Six Sense organs (eyes, ears, taste, touch, feel and brain) are understood for what they are,...deceivers.

And thus, as ACIM says, "the ego uses the body to conspire against your Mind (in this context the Mind has no relation to intellect), and because the ego realizes that its 'enemy' (the Mind) can end them both (ego and body) merely by recognizing they are not part of You (the Mind), they join in the attack together. This is perhaps the strangest perception of all, if you consider what it really involves.
The ego, which is not real, attempts to persuade the Mind, which is real, that the Mind is ego's learning device; and further, that the body is more real then the Mind is.
No one in their right Mind could possibly believe this, and no one in Their 'right Mind' does believe it" 6 IV 5.

Allow me to repeat that,...."No one in their right Mind could possibly believe this, and no one in Their 'right Mind' does believe it"


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ][ I shut my eyes in order to see ] [ FAQ ]

Return To (THE REAL) My Site (RainSpirite.Com)



Ad Free Message Board | Terms Of Service | Smilies Legend | EBCode Legend